<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CW on OH2DQH</title>
    <link>https://oh2dqh.fi/tags/cw/</link>
    <description>Recent content in CW on OH2DQH</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2025 10:00:00 +0300</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://oh2dqh.fi/tags/cw/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The RST System: How Ham Radio Operators Report Signal Quality</title>
      <link>https://oh2dqh.fi/field-notes/rst-system/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2025 10:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>https://oh2dqh.fi/field-notes/rst-system/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When two amateur radio stations make contact, one of the first things they exchange is a signal report. Rather than trying to describe signal quality in free-form words across potentially noisy, weak, or multilingual paths, the hobby settled long ago on a compact three-digit code: &lt;strong&gt;RST&lt;/strong&gt;. It stands for &lt;strong&gt;Readability&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;Strength&lt;/strong&gt;, and &lt;strong&gt;Tone&lt;/strong&gt;, and it works the same way everywhere on the planet.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;r--readability-15&#34;&gt;R — Readability (1–5)&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Readability describes how well you can actually understand the content of the received signal — not how loud it is, but how intelligible it is.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
